‘A Gentle Whisper in Your Ear’

Post-9/11 & Post-Mumbai Fire Engineering – What Future ?

Previous Posts in This Series …

2011-10-25:  NIST’s Recommendations on the 9-11 WTC Building Collapses … GROUP 1. Increased Structural Integrity – Recommendations 1, 2 & 3 (out of 30)

2011-11-18:  NIST WTC Recommendations 4-7 > Structural Fire Endurance … GROUP 2.  Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures – Recommendations 4, 5, 6 & 7

2011-11-24:  NIST WTC Recommendations 8-11 > New Design of Structures … GROUP 3.  New Methods for Fire Resisting Design of Structures – Recommendations 8, 9, 10 & 11

2011-11-25:  NIST WTC Recommendations 12-15 > Improved Active Protection … GROUP 4.  Improved Active Fire Protection – Recommendations 12, 13, 14 & 15

2011-11-30:  NIST Recommendations 16-20 > Improved People Evacuation … GROUP 5.  Improved Building Evacuation – Recommendations 16, 17, 18, 19 & 20

2011-12-04:  NIST WTC Recommendations 21-24 > Improved Firefighting … GROUP 6.  Improved Emergency Response – Recommendations 21, 22, 23 & 24

2011-12-07:  NIST WTC Recommendations 25-28 > Improved Practices … GROUP 7.  Improved Procedures and Practices – Recommendations 25, 26, 27 & 28

2011-12-08:  NIST WTC Recommendations 29-30 > Improved Fire Education … GROUP 8.  Education and Training – Recommendations 29 & 30 (out of 30)

.

.

2011-12-15:  You know what is coming soon … so Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to One and All !!

.

  1.     There were 2 Important Reasons for undertaking this Series of Posts …

(a)       The General Public, and particularly Client Organizations, should be facilitated in directly accessing the core content of the 2005 NIST WTC Recommendations.  Up to now, many people have found this to be a daunting task.  More importantly, I also wanted to clearly show that implementation of the Recommendations is still proceeding far too slowly … and that today, many significant aspects of these Recommendations remain unimplemented.  Furthermore, in the case of some recent key national standards, e.g. British Standard BS 9999, which was published in 2008 … the NIST Recommendations were entirely ignored.

As a golden rule … National Building Codes/Regulations and National Standards … cannot, should not, and must not … be applied without informed thought and many questions, on the part of a building designer !

(b)       With the benefit of hindsight, and our practical experience in FireOx International … I also wanted to add a necessary 2011 Technical Commentary to the NIST Recommendations … highlighting some of the radical implications, and some of the limitations, of these Recommendations … in the hope of initiating a much-needed and long overdue international discussion on the subject.

” Architecture is the language of a culture.”

” A living building is the information space where life can be found.  Life exists within the space.  The information of space is then the information of life.  Space is the body of the building.  The building is therefore the space, the information, and the life.”

C.Y. Lee & Partners Architects/Planners, Taiwan

[ This is a local dialect of familiar Architectural Language.  However, the new multi-aspect language of Sustainable Design is fast evolving.  In order to perform as an effective and creative member of a Trans-Disciplinary Design & Construction Team ... can Fire Engineers quickly learn to communicate on these wavelengths ??   Evidence to date suggests not ! ]

.

  2.     ‘Climate Change’ & ‘Energy Stability’ – Relentless Driving Forces for Sustainable Design !

Not only is Sustainable Fire Engineering inevitable … it must be !   And not at some distant point in the future … but now … yesterday !!   There is such a build-up of pressure on Spatial Planners and Building Designers to respond quickly, creatively, intuitively and appropriately to the relentless driving forces of Climate Change (including climate change mitigation, adaptation, and severe weather resilience) and Energy Stability (including energy efficiency and conservation) … that there is no other option for the International Fire Science and Engineering Community but to adapt.  Adapt and evolve … or become irrelevant !!

And one more interesting thought to digest … ‘Green’ is not the answer.  ’Green’ looks at only one aspect of Sustainable Human & Social Development … the Environment.  This is a blinkered, short-sighted, simplistic and ill-conceived approach to realizing the complex goal of a Safe and Sustainable Built Environment.  ‘Green’ is ‘Sustainability’ for innocent children !!

.

  (a)      Organization for Economic Co-Operation & Development (OECD) – 2012′s Environmental Outlook to 2050

Extract from Pre-Release Climate Change Chapter, November 2011 …

‘ Climate change presents a global systemic risk to society.  It threatens the basic elements of life for all people: access to water, food production, health, use of land, and physical and natural capital.  Inadequate attention to climate change could have significant social consequences for human wellbeing, hamper economic growth and heighten the risk of abrupt and large-scale changes to our climatic and ecological systems.  The significant economic damage could equate to a permanent loss in average per capita world consumption of more than 14% (Stern, 2006).  Some poor countries would be likely to suffer particularly severely.  This chapter demonstrates how avoiding these economic, social and environmental costs will require effective policies to shift economies onto low-carbon and climate-resilient growth paths.’

  (b)      U.N. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Greenhouse Gas Bulletin No.7, November 2011

Executive Summary …

The latest analysis of observations from the WMO Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Programme shows that the globally averaged mixing ratios of Carbon Dioxide (CO₂), Methane (CH₄) and Nitrous Oxide (N₂O) reached new highs in 2010, with CO₂ at 389.0 parts per million (ppm), CH₄ at 1808 parts per billion (ppb) and N₂O at 323.2 ppb.  These values are greater than those in pre-industrial times (before 1750) by 39%, 158% and 20%, respectively.  Atmospheric increases of CO₂ and N₂O from 2009 to 2010 are consistent with recent years, but they are higher than both those observed from 2008 to 2009 and those averaged over the past 10 years.  Atmospheric CH₄ continues to increase, consistent with the past three years.  The U.S. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Annual Greenhouse Gas Index shows that from 1990 to 2010 radiative forcing by long-lived Greenhouse Gases (GHG’s) increased by 29%, with CO₂ accounting for nearly 80% of this increase.  Radiative forcing of N₂O exceeded that of CFC-12, making N₂O the third most important long-lived Greenhouse Gas.

  (c)      International Energy Agency (IEA) – World Energy Outlook, November 2011

Extract from Executive Summary …

‘ There are few signs that the urgently needed change in direction in global energy trends is underway.  Although the recovery in the world economy since 2009 has been uneven, and future economic prospects remain uncertain, global primary energy demand rebounded by a remarkable 5% in 2010, pushing CO₂ emissions to a new high.  Subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption of fossil fuels jumped to over $400 billion.  The number of people without access to electricity remained unacceptably high at 1.3 Billion, around 20% of the world’s population.  Despite the priority in many countries to increase energy efficiency, global energy intensity worsened for the second straight year.  Against this unpromising background, events such as those at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant and the turmoil in parts of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have cast doubts on the reliability of energy supply, while concerns about sovereign financial integrity have shifted the focus of government attention away from energy policy and limited their means of policy intervention, boding ill for agreed global climate change objectives.’

[ Not just in the case of Tall, Super-Tall and Mega-Tall Buildings ... but the many, many Other Building Types in the Built Environment ... are Building Designers implementing the 2005 & 2008 NIST WTC Recommendations ... without waiting for Building and Fire Codes/Regulations and Standards to be properly revised and updated ??   Evidence to date suggests not ! ]

.

  3.     Separate Dilemmas for Client Organizations and Building Designers …

As discussed earlier in this Series … the Fire Safety Objectives of Building and Fire Codes/Regulations are limited to:

• The protection of building users/occupants ;   and
• The protection of property … BUT only insofar as that is relevant to the protection of the users/occupants ;

… because the function of Building and Fire Codes is to protect Society.  Well, that is supposed to be true !   Unfortunately, not all Codes/Regulations are adequate or up-to-date … as we have been observing here in these posts.

.

Just taking the Taipei 101 Tower as an example, I have very recently sent out three genuine, bona fide e-mail messages from our practice …

2011-12-08

Toshiba Elevator & Building Systems Corporation (TELC), Japan.

To Whom It May Concern …

Knowing that your organization was involved in the Taipei 101 Project … we have been examining your WebSite very carefully.  However, some important information was missing from there.

For our International Work … we would like to receive technical information on the Use of Elevators for Fire Evacuation in Buildings … which we understand is actually happening in the Taipei Tower, since it was completed in 2004.

The Universal Design approach must also be integrated into any New Elevators.

Can you help us ?

C.J. Walsh

[2012-01-10 ... No reply yet !]

.

2011-12-12

Mr. Thomas Z. Scarangello P.E. – Chairman & CEO, Thornton Tomasetti Structural Engineers, New York.

Dear Thomas,

Knowing that your organization was involved in the structural design of the Taipei 101 Tower, which was completed in 2004 … and in the on-going design of many other iconic tall, super-tall and mega-tall buildings around the world … we have been examining your Company Brochures and WebSite very carefully.  However, some essential information is missing.

As you are certainly aware … implementation of the 2005 & 2008 National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) Recommendations on the Collapse of WTC Buildings 1, 2 & 7, in New York, on 11 September 2001 … is still proceeding at a snail’s pace, i.e. very slowly.  Today, many significant aspects of NIST’s Recommendations remain unimplemented.

For our International Work … we would like to understand how you have responded directly to the NIST Recommendations … and incorporated the necessary additional modifications into your current structural fire engineering designs.

Many thanks for your kind attention.  In anticipation of your prompt and detailed response …

C.J. Walsh

[2012-01-10 ... No reply yet !]

.

2011-12-14

Mr. C.Y. Lee & Mr. C.P. Wang, Principal Architects – C.Y. Lee & Partners Architects/Planners, Taiwan.

Dear Sirs,

Knowing that your architectural practice designed the Taipei 101 Tower, which was completed in 2004 … and, later, was also involved in the design of other tall and super-tall buildings in Taiwan and China … we have been examining your Company WebSite very carefully.  However, some essential information is missing.

As you are probably aware … implementation of the 2005 & 2008 U.S. National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) Recommendations on the Collapse of WTC Buildings 1, 2 & 7, in New York City, on 11 September 2001 … is still proceeding at a snail’s pace, i.e. very slowly.  Today, many significant aspects of NIST’s Recommendations remain unimplemented.

For our International Work … we would like to understand how you have responded directly to the NIST Recommendations … and incorporated the necessary additional modifications into your current architectural designs.

Many thanks for your kind attention.  In anticipation of your prompt and detailed response …

C.J. Walsh

[2012-01-10 ... No reply yet !]

.

So … how many Clients, or Client Organizations, are aware that to properly protect their interests … even, a significant part of their interests … it is vitally necessary that Project-Specific Fire Engineering Design Objectives be developed which will have a much wider scope ?   The answer is … not many !

How many Architects, Structural Engineers, and Fire Engineers fully explain this to their Clients or Client Organizations ?

And how many Clients/Client Organizations either know that they should ask, or have the balls to ask … their Architect, Structural Engineer and Fire Engineer for this explanation … and furthermore, in the case of any High-Rise Building, Iconic Building, or Building having an Important Function or an Innovative Design … ask the same individuals for some solid reassurance that they have responded directly to the 2005 & 2008 NIST WTC Recommendations … and incorporated the necessary additional modifications into your current designs … whatever current Building and Fire Codes/Regulations do or do not say ??   A big dilemma !

.

A common and very risky dilemma for Building Designers, however, arises in the situation where the Project Developer, i.e. the Client/Client Organization … is the same as the Construction Organization.  The Project Design & Construction Team - as a whole - now has very little power or authority if a conflict arises over technical aspects of the design … or over construction costs.  An even bigger dilemma !!

.

  4.     The Next Series of Posts – 2008 NIST WTC Recommendations

In the new year of 2012 … I will examine the later NIST Recommendations which were a response to the Fire-Induced Progressive Collapse of World Trade Center Building No.7.

.

  5.     Please … Your Comments, Views & Opinions ?!?

The future of  Conventional Fire Engineering ended on the morning of Tuesday, 11 September 2001, in New York City … an engineering discipline constrained by a long heritage deeply embedded in, and manacled to, an outdated and inflexible prescriptive approach to Codes/Regulations and Standards … an approach which is irrational, ignores the ‘real’ needs of the ‘real’ people who use and/or occupy ‘real’ buildings … and, quite frankly, no longer makes any scientific sense !!

On the other hand … having confronted the harsh realities of 9/11 and the Mumbai ‘Hive’ Attacks, and digested the 2005 & 2008 NIST WTC Recommendations … Sustainable Fire Engineering … having a robust empirical basis, being ‘person-centred’, and positively promoting creativity … offers the International Fire Science and Engineering Community a confident journey forward into the future … on many diverse routes !

This IS the only appropriate response to the exciting architectural innovations and fire safety challenges of today’s Built Environment.

BUT … what do you think ?

.

.

END

Tags: 'Green' is 'Sustainability' for innocent children !!, 'Green' looks at only one aspect of Sustainable Human & Social Development ... the Environment, 'The Cloud' Residential Tower Project in Seoul (South Korea), 2005 NIST WTC RECOMMENDATIONS, 2012's Environmental Outlook to 2050, A living building is the information space where life can be found, Accessible Fire Engineering, Active fire protection, Adapt and evolve ... or become irrelevant !!, Adrian Smith & Gordon Gill Architecture, Architecture is the language of a culture, ask the same individuals for some solid reassurance, British Standard BS 9999 - Code of Practice for Fire Safety in the Design Management and Use of Buildings, Building Designers, Built Environment, C.Y. Lee & Partners Architects/Planners, can Fire Engineers quickly learn to communicate on these wavelengths, China, Client Organizations, Climate Change (including climate change mitigation adaptation and severe weather resilience), Climate Change Adaptation, Climate change presents a global systemic risk to society, Design by MVRDV Architects, digested the 2005 & 2008 NIST WTC Recommendations, Energy Stability (including energy efficiency and conservation), Executive Summary, Extract from Pre-Release Climate Change Chapter, Fire Engineering Design, Fire Safety, Fire-Induced Progressive Collapse of World Trade Center Building No.7, FireOx International, fully explain this to their Clients or Client Organizations, General Public, Gensler Architects & Planners, GROUP 1. Increased Structural Integrity - Recommendations 1 2 & 3 (out of 30), GROUP 8. Education and Training - Recommendations 29 & 30 (out of 30), having confronted the harsh realities of 9/11 and the Mumbai 'Hive' Attacks, how many Clients/Client Organizations either know that they should ask or have the balls to ask, I also wanted to add a necessary 2011 Technical Commentary to the NIST Recommendations, if a conflict arises over technical aspects of the design ... or over construction costs, In order to perform as an effective and creative member of a Trans-Disciplinary Design & Construction Team, in the case of some recent key national standards, incorporated the necessary additional modifications into your current structural fire engineering designs, Indonesia, International Energy Agency (IEA) - World Energy Outlook, International Fire Science and Engineering Community, it is vitally necessary that Project-Specific Fire Engineering Design Objectives be developed which will have a much wider scope, Kingdom Tower Project, many Other Building Types in the Built Environment, many people have found this to be a daunting task, many significant aspects of these Recommendations remain unimplemented, Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to One and All !!, Mr. Thomas Z. Scarangello P.E. - Chairman & CEO, must not ... be applied without informed thought and many questions on the part of a building designer, National Building Codes/Regulations and National Standards, National Institute of Standards & Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Netherlands, NIST, NIST WTC Recommendations 29-30 > Improved Fire Education, NIST's Recommendations on the 9-11 WTC Building Collapses, not all Codes/Regulations are adequate or up-to-date, Not just in the case of Tall Super-Tall and Mega-Tall Buildings, One World Trade Center Project, Organization for Economic Co-Operation & Development (OECD), photograph, Post-9/11 & Post-Mumbai Fire Engineering - What Future ?, Relentless Driving Forces for Sustainable Design, Saudi Arabia, Seoul, Separate Dilemmas for Client Organizations and Building Designers, Shanghai Tower Project, Signature Tower Project in Jakarta, Skidmore Owings & Merrill Architects/Planners, Smallwood Reynolds Stewart Stewart Architects & Planners, South Korea, Space is the body of the building, Structure fire, Sustainable Design, Sustainable Fire Engineering, Sustainable Fire Engineering ... having a robust empirical basis being 'person-centred' and positively promoting creativity, Sustainable Human & Social Development, Taipei 101 Tower, Taiwan, the exciting architectural innovations and fire safety challenges of today's Built Environment, the Fire Safety Objectives of Building and Fire Codes/Regulations are limited, the function of Building and Fire Codes is to protect Society, The future of Conventional Fire Engineering ended on the morning of Tuesday 11 September 2001, The General Public and particularly Client Organizations should be facilitated in directly accessing the core content, The Netherlands, the new multi-aspect language of Sustainable Design is fast evolving, the NIST Recommendations were entirely ignored, The Project Design & Construction Team - as a whole - now has very little power or authority, The protection of building users/occupants, The protection of property ... BUT only insofar as that is relevant to the protection of the users/occupants, the situation where the Project Developer i.e. the Client/Client Organization ... is the same as the Construction Organization, The Universal Design approach must also be integrated into any New Elevators, There are few signs that the urgently needed change in direction in global energy trends is underway, There were 2 Important Reasons for undertaking this Series of Posts, This is a local dialect of familiar Architectural Language, Thornton Tomasetti Structural Engineers, Toshiba Elevator & Building Systems Corporation (TELC) Japan, U.N. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Greenhouse Gas Bulletin No.7, U.S. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, United States of America, Use of Elevators for Fire Evacuation in Buildings, we would like to understand how you have responded directly to the NIST Recommendations, without waiting for Building and Fire Codes/Regulations and Standards to be properly revised and updated, WMO Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Programme

Remembering Dr. Ernesto ‘EL CHE’ Guevara de la Serna Lynch ?

2011-10-10:  Yesterday … did anyone remember the myth that is … and the man of Latin America that was … Dr. Ernesto ‘EL CHE’ Guevara de la Serna Lynch … assassinated on 9 October 1967, in Bolivia ??

.

.

.

.

.

END

Tags: 'CHE' Street Hoarding in Cienfuegos Cuba, 'EL CHE' Guevara, a small museum in the central square of Yara (Plaza Grito de Yara) Cuba, an image of CHE with the accompanying text "Tu Ejemplo Vive - Tus Ideas Perduran", built to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Battle for Santa Clara, Centuries earlier nearby the Indian hero Hatuey was burned at the stake, CJ Walsh, Colour photograph showing the memorial in Plaza de la Revolución Santa Clara Cuba, it was designed by the Architect Jorge Cao Campos, Memorial 'Comandante Ernesto Che Guevara' in Santa Clara Cuba, Remembering Dr. Ernesto 'CHE' Guevara de la Serna Lynch, The memorial complex also comprises the mausoleum of Che Guevara and a museum, the Sculptor José Delarra, Unveiled on 28 December 1988

Osaka’s 2011 Cherry Blossom Walk in Post-Disaster Japan ?

2011-04-19:  This year’s Osaka Cherry Blossom Viewing & Festival Market is taking place right now … from 14 April until 20 April 2011 … at the Osaka Mint Bureau (Zoheikyoku) … the head office of Japan Mint … a governmental agency responsible for the supply of coins and medals, and the analysis, testing and certification of metals.

The 560 metre long Cherry Blossom Walk in Osaka is famous, throughout Japan, for its 352 Cherry (Sakura) Trees … comprising 128 Cherry Varieties.  It is open for public viewing during one week each year, usually in April, when the flowers are in full bloom.

In 2010, there were 602,000 visitors … and I was very fortunate to be one of those !

In 2011, the Themed Flowering Cherry is ‘IMOSE’ … so named, because it often bears two fruits from one flower.  The flowers are light and dark red in colour … with around 30 petals, which bloom in two stages.

.

Before the recent Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster in Japan … I would have automatically selected photographs which focused on the Cherry Blossoms, and had few if any people in view.  Now, however, it is important to show ordinary Japanese people … people of all ages … enjoying a simple pleasure in life.  These are the very same people who were caught up in the tragedy, and continue to suffer horrendously.

Now is the time, after the world’s short attention span has moved on to the next natural or man-made disaster, to continue to keep these people in our thoughts.

.

2011 Japanese Earthquake & Tsunami Appeal

I am a Member of the Ireland Japan Association (IJA).  If you wish to make a donation, please go directly to the IJA WebSite … http://www.ija.ie/ … and please, please give generously.  Thank you.

.

.

END

Tags: 2011 Japanese Earthquake & Tsunami Appeal, 352 Cherry (Sakura) Trees ... comprising 128 Cherry Varieties, Built Environment, CJ Walsh, human environment, In 2010 there were 602000 visitors, In 2011 the Themed Flowering Cherry is 'IMOSE', Ireland Japan Association (IJA), it often bears two fruits from one flower, Japan, Japan Mint ... a governmental agency responsible for the supply of coins and medals, open for public viewing during one week each year when the flowers are in full bloom, Osaka Cherry Blossom Viewing & Festival Market, Osaka Mint Bureau (Zoheikyoku), Osaka's 2011 Cherry Blossom Walk in Post-Disaster Japan, please please give generously, Social Environment, Sustainable Human & Social Development, The 560 metre long Cherry Blossom Walk in Osaka is famous, The flowers are light and dark red in colour ... with around 30 petals, the recent Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster in Japan

Vienna & ‘The Third Man’ – Film Locations (II)

2011-02-14 …

The 1949 film: The Third Man - directed by Carol Reed, with the haunting zither music of Anton Karas, and starring Joseph Cotton, Alida Valli, Orson Welles and Trevor Howard … also ‘stars’ the war-damaged city of Vienna, in Austria.

The film screenplay, based on his own original story, was written by Graham Greene.

Late in the Film … having discovered that Harry Lime (Orson Welles) is, after all, alive … Holly Martins (Joseph Cotton) demands to meet him at the Prater Giant Ferris Wheel …

Holly and Harry Lime Meet at the Prater Giant Ferris Wheel

Click the Link Above to Download and/or View this Film Scene Clip (Flash Video File, 4.40 Mb)

.

.

Wiener Prater – the Prater in Vienna – is a large public park situated in the centre-city district of ‘Leopoldstadt’ … and located between the River Danube (German: Donau) and the Danube Canal.  The Wurstelprater Amusement Park stands at one corner of the Prater and includes the Riesenrad (English: Giant Ferris Wheel).

.

.

.

The Prater Giant Ferris Wheel was built in 1896-97 by the engineer, Walter B. Basset … a retired British naval officer.  He also built similar Wheels – very popular at the end of the 19th Century – in Chicago, London, Blackpool and Paris.  Only the Prater Ferris Wheel, in Vienna, survives today.

.

.

The Giant Ferris Wheel is 61.0 metres in diameter and turns with a speed of 0.75 m per second.  On a clear day, it presents a magnificent panorama of the city from each of its 15 cabins.

.

.

.

.

.

END

Tags: also ‘stars’ the war-damaged city of Vienna in Austria, and starring Joseph Cotton - Alida Valli - Orson Welles - Trevor Howard, Built Environment, directed by Carol Reed, having discovered that Harry Lime (Orson Welles) is alive ... Holly Martins (Joseph Cotton) demands to meet him at the Prater Giant Ferris Wheel, Holly and Harry Lime Meet at the Prater Giant Ferris Wheel, Late in the Film ..., located between the River Danube (German: Donau) and the Danube Canal, On a clear day it presents a magnificent panorama of the city from each of its 15 cabins, Only the Prater Ferris Wheel in Vienna survives today, Social Environment, The 1949 film: The Third Man, The film screenplay - based on his own original story - was written by Graham Greene, The Giant Ferris Wheel is 61.0 metres in diameter and turns with a speed of 0.75 m per second, The Prater Giant Ferris Wheel was built in 1896-97 by the engineer Walter B. Basset, The Wurstelprater Amusement Park stands at one corner of the Prater and includes the Riesenrad (English: Giant Ferris Wheel), Vienna & 'The Third Man' - Film Locations (II), Wiener Prater - the Prater in Vienna - is a large public park situated in the centre-city district of 'Leopoldstadt', with the haunting zither music of Anton Karas

Japan in April and May 2010 … Accessibility-for-All !

2010-10-20:  In Europe … we are experts at talking about an Accessible Built Environment … and hopeless when it comes to effective implementation …

Built Environment:  Anywhere there is, or has been, a man-made or wrought (worked) intervention by humans in the natural environment, e.g. cities, towns, villages, rural settlements, roads, bridges, tunnels, transport systems, service utilities, and cultivated lands, lakes, rivers, coasts, seas, etc. … including the Virtual Environment.

Virtual Environment:  A designed environment, electronically-generated from within the Built Environment, which may have the appearance, form, functionality and impact – to the person perceiving and actually experiencing it – of a real, imagined and/or utopian world.

However, I would like to share not just one single moment in Japan, but a Series of Special Moments … where I was observing and studying, up close and personal, the ‘real’ implementation of Accessibility-for-All in Public Places … including some discrete detailing at the Main Gate to Kanazawa Castle … Ishikawa-mon.

When I say Accessibility-for-All … I mean Accessibility Design, with all of the rambling philosophical bullshit removed.  The emphasis can then properly be placed on a high level of quality in Actual Accessibility Performance provided for users of the built environment … all users, because many of the details shown in the photographs below make movement in and around public places safer and more convenient for everybody.

Some of the many Aspects in Japan which, together, facilitate this high level of quality in Actual Accessibility Performance …

• A robust legal base mandating the provision of Accessibility-for-All ;
• Determined political will ;
• Sufficient financial resources ;
• A compassionate and understanding bureaucracy – at all levels in society ;
• Competence, i.e. education, training and experience, of spatial planners, architects, engineers, quantity surveyors, etc … and members of construction organizations ;
• Innovative, well-designed accessibility-related products which can be shown to be ‘fit for their intended use’.

The following European Guideline Framework … which I drafted in 2003, and later incorporated into the 2004 Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Sustainable Social Development, Disability & Ageing … is useful …

C.J. Walsh

Guideline Framework on EU Equal Opportunity & Social Inclusion for All

Click the Link Above to read and/or download PDF File (82kb)

.

Much of the Accessibility Detailing in Japan far exceeds, in quality of performance, what is described in the Proposed International Standards Organization (ISO) Accessibility-for-All Standard … to be published, hopefully(!), in 2011 … and here is a small taste …

.

.

.

.

It is important to link one activity/task/function with the next … (please ignore the awkward step up at the entrance to the train carriage … instead, look at the wonderful entrance detail in the next photograph below) …

.

What a beauty !

.

Common everywhere … a closer look at the information which can very easily be provided on all handrails …

.

The Main Gate to Kanazawa Castle … Ishikawa-mon …

.

.

.

END

Tags: 2004 Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Sustainable Social Development Disability and Ageing, Accessibility Design with all of the rambling philosophical bullshit removed, Accessibility Detailing in Japan, Accessibility-for-All, Built Environment, Built Environment ... Anywhere there is - or has been - a man-made or wrought (worked) intervention by humans in the natural environment, CJ Walsh, Client Organizations, compassionate and understanding bureaucracy - at all levels in society, Competence of spatial planners - architects - engineers - quantity surveyors - etc ... and members of construction organizations, Determined political will, emphasis can then properly be placed on a high level of quality in Actual Accessibility Performance, EU, european union, Guideline Framework on EU Equal Opportunity and Social Inclusion, hopeless when it comes to effective implementation, human and social rights, I would like to share not just one single moment in Japan but a Series of Special Moments, In Europe ... we are experts at talking about an Accessible Built Environment, Innovative well-designed accessibility-related products which can be shown to be 'fit for their intended use', It is important to link one activity/task/function with the next, Japan in April & May 2010 - Accessibility-for-All, many of the details shown in the photographs below make movement in and around public places safer and more convenient for everybody, People with Activity Limitations (2001 WHO ICF), Personnes à Performances Réduites (2001 WHO ICF), photograph, Proposed International Standards Organization (ISO) Accessibility-for-All Standard, provided for all users of the built environment, robust legal base mandating the provision of Accessibility-for-All, some discrete detailing at the Main Gate to Kanazawa Castle ... Ishikawa-mon, Some of the many Aspects in Japan which - together - facilitate this high level of quality in Actual Accessibility Performance, Sufficient financial resources, Sustainability Implementation, Sustainable Design, Sustainable Human & Social Development, the 'real' implementation of Accessibility-for-All in Public Places

IABSE (Ireland) Inaugural Event on 16th November 2010

For many years, I have been a Member of IABSE (International Association for Bridge & Structural Engineering).  So, I am particularly pleased to share the news that an IABSE National Group has recently been established in Ireland … and that its first major event will take place in Trinity College Dublin … on 16th November 2010 … at 19.15 hrs.

Miguel Angel Astiz, from the Spanish Engineering Design Office of Carlos Fernandez Casado S.L. (http://www.cfcsl.com/), will speak on the subject of …

Design of Major Bridges – State of the Art & Current Trends

Click the Link Above to read and/or download PDF File (263kb)

.

IABSE is a scientific and technical Organization with approximately 3,900 Members in 100 Countries, including 49 National Groups worldwide.  Founded in 1929, its secretariat is located in Zurich, Switzerland.

IABSE deals with all aspects of structural engineering: the science and art of planning, design, construction, operation, monitoring and inspection, maintenance, rehabilitation and preservation, de-construction and dismantling of structures, taking into consideration technical, economic, environmental, aesthetic and social aspects.  The term ‘Structures’ includes bridges, buildings and all types of civil engineering structures, composed of any structural material.

.

.

END

Tags: an IABSE National Group has recently been established in Ireland, Built Environment, Design of Major Bridges - State of the Art and Current Trends, Founded in 1929 ... the IABSE secretariat is located in Zurich Switzerland, IABSE (Ireland) Inaugural Event on 16 November 2010, IABSE deals with all aspects of structural engineering: the science and art of planning - design - construction - operation - monitoring - inspection - maintenance - rehabilitation - preservation - de, IABSE is a scientific and technical Organization with approximately 3900 Members in 100 Countries ... including 49 National Groups worldwide, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Ireland, Miguel Angel Astiz from the Spanish Engineering Design Office of Carlos Fernandez Casado S.L., taking into consideration technical - economic - environmental - aesthetic - social aspects, the first major IABSE (Ireland) event will take place in Trinity College Dublin ... on 16th November 2010 ... at 19.15 hrs, The term 'Structures' includes bridges - buildings - all types of civil engineering structures ... composed of any structural material

Japan in April and May 2010 … Special Moments (II)

2010-10-03:  At an impressionable young age, I was exposed to the Landscape Design ‘Shock and Awe’ of the Palace Gardens at Versailles, just outside Paris in France.  In Europe … we are convinced that we know it all … and that we have all the answers.  Let me break the bad news … we don’t !

Japan is another world … another experience … jaw-dropping, eye-popping, breath-taking … a feast for the mind.  Here is a very good example of a different approach … to me, a far more attractive approach … to shaping and moulding the landscape …

With an area of approximately 10 hectares … Kenroku-en Park in Kanazawa City is the largest of the three famous Gardens in Japan (the others are in Mito and Okayama).  It is also considered to be the most beautiful.  The Park is an informally styled landscaped garden with characteristics typical of the Edo Period.  Originally the outer garden of Kanazawa Castle, it is located on the slope facing the castle’s Main Gate … Ishikawa-mon.  A busy road now separates the two !

This Park embodies the unification of the six qualities:  honour, ceremony, expanse, artistic design, coolness, and scenic harmony.

Completed in 1837, the Park was first opened to the public on 7 May 1874.  It was designated a National Site of Special Scenic Beauty on 20 March 1985.

Here are some random scenes … and a plan.  Enjoy … and please notice the details …

.

Kotojitoro Lantern …

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

END

Tags: Built Environment, CJ Walsh, designated a National Site of Special Scenic Beauty on 20 March 1985, Here is a very good example of a far more attractive approach to shaping and moulding the landscape, Japan in April & May 2010 - Special Moments, Japan is another world ... another experience ... jaw-dropping eye-popping breath-taking ... a feast for the mind, Kenroku-en Park in Kanazawa City is the largest of the three famous Gardens in Japan, Landscape Design 'Shock and Awe' of the Palace Gardens at Versailles, photograph, Sustainable Human & Social Development, This Park embodies the unification of the six qualities: honour - ceremony - expanse - artistic design - coolness - scenic harmony

Japan in April and May 2010 – Special Moments (I)

2010-06-07:  People who visited this Post during the summer … some, many times … want more of an explanation.  In this case … ‘Less was not More’ !   Apologies.

In the North of Kyoto City … Rokuon-Ji Temple – The Golden Pavilion … a very elegant three storey building, harmoniously integrated into the landscape … and clearly intended to be reflected in the water of Kyōko-chi (Mirror Pond).

.

Looking more closely at the Pavilion, each of the Three Floors has a different Architectural Style:

     1.  Hō-sui-in … the Name of the First/Ground Floor … built in the palace style, known as Shinden-zukuri.

     2.  Chō-on-dō … the Name of the Second Floor … built in the style of samurai houses, known as Buke-zukuri.

     3.  Kukkyō-chō … the Name of the Third Floor … built in the style of Karayō, or Zen Temple.

Both the 2nd and 3rd Floors are covered with gold leaf on Japanese lacquer.  The roof covering, throughout, is cedar wood shingle.  The Phoenix, at the top, promises good fortune.

.

.

END

Tags: a very elegant three storey building harmoniously integrated into the landscape, Chō-on-dō ... built in the style of samurai houses known as Buke-zukuri, clearly intended to be reflected in the water of Kyōko-chi (Mirror Pond), Hō-sui-in ... built in the palace style known as Shinden-zukuri, Japan in April and May 2010 - Special Moments, Kukkyō-chō ... built in the style of Karayō or Zen Temple, Looking more closely at the Pavilion ... each of the Three Floors has a different Architectural Style, Rokuon-Ji Temple - The Golden Pavilion ... in the North of Kyoto, Sustainable Human & Social Development, The Phoenix at the top promises good fortune

Buildings of Historical, Architectural & Cultural Importance !

Deeply interested … and ‘luuuving’ … a hands-on and direct involvement in the Sustainable Restoration of Buildings which are of Historical, Architectural or Cultural Importance … or even those buildings which are not so important … I am deeply frustrated and angry when I look around at what has happened … and continues to happen … in Ireland … horrible, damaging interventions and alterations of all kinds … too many of which cannot be undone.

Certain guru-like organizations and individuals must be robustly challenged !

Yes … in everyday practice, there are pressures concerning an improvement of energy performance (BER Certificates !) … an improvement of accessibility performance for people with activity limitations (2001 WHO ICF) … an improvement of fire safety performance, etc., etc. … and, in the next few short years, adaptation to climate change will require serious attention.

BUT – BUT – BUT … in dealing with these buildings (a priceless heritage for our children, and their children, which cannot be replaced !) … some absolutely core principles must influence the minds of decision-makers in client and construction organizations, regulators and, most importantly, the minds and souls of architects and engineers.  Do engineers have souls ?

 

ICOMOS – International Council on Monuments & Sites / Conseil International des Monuments et des Sites – works for the conservation and protection of cultural heritage places and is the only global, non-governmental organization of its kind.  It is dedicated to promoting the application of theory, methodology, and scientific techniques to the conservation of the architectural and archaeological heritage.  Its work is based on the principles enshrined in the 1964 International Charter on the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter).

From practical experience, I have found the 16 Principles of the 1964 Venice Charter to be enormously helpful …

ARTICLE 1  The concept of an historic monument embraces not only the single architectural work but also the urban or rural setting in which is found the evidence of a particular civilization, a significant development or an historic event.  This applies not only to great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.

ARTICLE 2  The conservation and restoration of monuments must have recourse to all the sciences and techniques which can contribute to the study and safeguarding of the architectural heritage.

ARTICLE 3  The intention in conserving and restoring monuments is to safeguard them no less as works of art than as historical evidence.

ARTICLE 4  It is essential to the conservation of monuments that they be maintained on a permanent basis.

ARTICLE 5  The conservation of monuments is always facilitated by making use of them for some socially useful purpose.  Such use is therefore desirable but it must not change the lay-out or decoration of the building.  It is within these limits only that modifications demanded by a change of function should be envisaged and may be permitted.

ARTICLE 6  The conservation of a monument implies preserving a setting which is not out of scale.  Wherever the traditional setting exists, it must be kept.  No new construction, demolition or modification which would alter the relations of mass and colour must be allowed.

ARTICLE 7  A monument is inseparable from the history to which it bears witness and from the setting in which it occurs.  The moving of all or part of a monument cannot be allowed except where the safeguarding of that monument demands it or where it is justified by national or international interest of paramount importance.

ARTICLE 8  Items of sculpture, painting or decoration which form an integral part of a monument may only be removed from it if this is the sole means of ensuring their preservation.

ARTICLE 9  The process of restoration is a highly specialized operation.  Its aim is to preserve and reveal the aesthetic and historic value of the monument and is based on respect for original material and authentic documents.  It must stop at the point where conjecture begins, and in this case moreover any extra work which is indispensable must be distinct from the architectural composition and must bear a contemporary stamp.  The restoration in any case must be preceded and followed by an archaeological and historical study of the monument.

ARTICLE 10  Where traditional techniques prove inadequate, the consolidation of a monument can be achieved by the use of any modem technique for conservation and construction, the efficacy of which has been shown by scientific data and proved by experience.

ARTICLE 11  The valid contributions of all periods to the building of a monument must be respected, since unity of style is not the aim of a restoration.  When a building includes the superimposed work of different periods, the revealing of the underlying state can only be justified in exceptional circumstances and when what is removed is of little interest and the material which is brought to light is of great historical, archaeological or aesthetic value, and its state of preservation good enough to justify the action.  Evaluation of the importance of the elements involved and the decision as to what may be destroyed cannot rest solely on the individual in charge of the work.

ARTICLE 12  Replacements of missing parts must integrate harmoniously with the whole, but at the same time must be distinguishable from the original so that restoration does not falsify the artistic or historic evidence.

ARTICLE 13  Additions cannot be allowed except in so far as they do not detract from the interesting parts of the building, its traditional setting, the balance of its composition and its relation with its surroundings.

ARTICLE 14  The sites of monuments must be the object of special care in order to safeguard their integrity and ensure that they are cleared and presented in a seemly manner.  The work of conservation and restoration carried out in such places should be inspired by the principles set forth in the foregoing articles.

ARTICLE 15  Excavations should be carried out in accordance with scientific standards and the recommendation defining international principles to be applied in the case of archaeological excavation adopted by UNESCO in 1956.

Ruins must be maintained and measures necessary for the permanent conservation and protection of architectural features and of objects discovered must be taken.  Furthermore, every means must be taken to facilitate the understanding of the monument and to reveal it without ever distorting its meaning.

All reconstruction work should however be ruled out ‘a priori’.  Only anastylosis, that is to say, the reassembling of existing but dismembered parts can be permitted.  The material used for integration should always be recognizable and its use should be the least that will ensure the conservation of a monument and the reinstatement of its form.

ARTICLE 16  In all works of preservation, restoration or excavation, there should always be precise documentation in the form of analytical and critical reports, illustrated with drawings and photographs.  Every stage of the work of clearing, consolidation, rearrangement and integration, as well as technical and formal features identified during the course of the work, should be included.  This record should be placed in the archives of a public institution and made available to research workers.  It is recommended that the report should be published.

 

 

Footnote on Building Energy Rating (BER) Certificates in Ireland

Unless and until that magnificent marketing and public relations firm … Energy Ireland (SEI) … can openly show that the DEAP Software has been properly modified to handle buildings of historical, architectural or cultural importance … and this modification is fully transparent … BER Certification for these building types must be put on hold.

 

 

END

Tags: 1964 ICOMOS International Charter on the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter), a priceless heritage for our children and their children which cannot be replaced, Accessibility of buildings for people with disabilities, adaptation to climate change will require serious attention, BER Certificates, Building Energy Rating, Building Energy Rating (BER) Certificates in Ireland, Buildings of Historical Architectural or Cultural Importance, Built Environment, client and construction organizations - regulators - architects and engineers, Client Organizations, Conseil International des Monuments et des Sites, DEAP Software, Energy Ireland (SEI), Energy Performance of Buildings, Fire Safety, guru-like organizations and individuals, horrible damaging interventions and alterations of all kinds - too many of which cannot be undone, ICOMOS, improvement of accessibility performance, improvement of energy performance, improvement of fire safety performance, International Council on Monuments and Sites, Ireland, People with Activity Limitations (2001 WHO ICF), Personnes à Performances Réduites (2001 WHO ICF), some absolutely core principles must influence the minds of decision-makers, Statutory Instrument No 666 of 2006 - European Communities (Energy Performance of Buildings) Regulations 2006, Sustainability Implementation, Sustainable Design, Sustainable Human & Social Development, Sustainable Restoration, Technical Control of Construction

Sustainable Human & Social Development ?

‘Sustainable’ … ‘Sustainability’ … ‘Sustainable Development’ … what’s all this about ? … and where to begin ?

 

Words much abused … not only in English … but definitely in French !

 

Words much confused … for example, in the USA … where ‘Sustainable’ and ‘Green’ can be interchanged in the same conversation without apparent rhyme or reason.  Is there a difference between the two ?  Some people don’t want to admit that there is … those working in the Green Building Council … or those peddling the LEED Environmental Building Rating System around the more economically advanced developing countries in the world.  In India … you can find a ‘LEED’ Building, minimally adapted to local conditions and having used many imported products and systems in its construction (from you-know-where !) … sitting prettily in the neighbourhood of a slum.

 

In Ireland … remember the good old days, 12-18 months ago … when Economists could afford (?!?) to talk about ‘Sustainable Economic Development’ … did they really mean economic development which is compatible with sustainable development ?   No, they didn’t !

 

Is there any level of awareness amongst our Politicians ?   In the National Development Plan (2007-2013), Mr. Brian Cowan T.D., then Minister for Finance, wrote in a January 2007 Foreword to the Plan …

 

” This National Development Plan is about the future of those young people, their parents, and their grandparents.  It establishes a blueprint for the economic and social development of this island for future generations.

 

In this Plan, we have a unique window of opportunity to get it right: in terms of spatial planning, support infrastructure, environmental sustainability and economic growth.”

 

… an unusual limitation on the use and context for the word ‘sustainability’ … which should now also be exhibited in the National Gallery of Art !?!

 

Some Organizations openly state that they are dealing with … or they will only be dealing with … environmental aspects of sustainable development.  That is a silly waste of time … and counterproductive !

 

 

 

Properly Defining Sustainable Development

 

Let us quickly re-wind back to the end of the 20th Century …

 

… not as far back as the Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, which met in Sweden, from 5-16th June 1972 … which, for us, was a very interesting exercise …

 

… but to the 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), which was chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland (Norway).  Mansour Khalid (Sudan) was Vice-Chair of the Commission.

 

The definition of ‘Sustainable Development’ appears at the beginning of Chapter 2 …

 

” Sustainable Development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.  It contains within it two key concepts:

-         the concept of ‘needs’, in particular the essential needs of the world’s poor, to which overriding priority should be given ;   and

-         the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment’s ability to meet present and future needs.”

 

Many readers may only be familiar with the first sentence above but, in isolation, that leaves the definition of ‘sustainable development’ so vague that it is almost meaningless.  And let us be clear in our own minds … an ambiguous definition will continue to be rejected by the Developing and Least Developed Regions of the World … the concept being viewed as an unaffordable luxury and/or a means of continued domination and control by the ‘North’.

 

Other readers may be surprised by the second, and more important, half of the WCED/Brundtland Definition.  It is clear, however, that it was always intended that there would be more than 3 Aspects of Sustainable Development … Environmental, Social and Economic … to be identified and examined.  How, on this Earth, was it possible for anybody to ever bring into existence that clumsy 3-Circle Diagram ???

 

 

The 1987 WCED/Brundtland Report continues a little further on …

 

” The satisfaction of human needs and aspirations is the major objective of development.  The essential needs of vast numbers of people in developing countries – for food, clothing, shelter, jobs – are not being met, and beyond their basic needs these people have legitimate aspirations for an improved quality of life.  A world in which poverty and inequity are endemic will always be prone to ecological and other crises.  Sustainable Development requires meeting the basic needs of all and extending to all the opportunity to satisfy their aspirations for a better life.”

 

 

Sustainable Development is the greatest challenge ahead of us in this 21st Century.  It remains very much an intricate, open, dynamic and evolving concept …

 

… and a clear choice must be made: decide to pursue the detailed elaboration of this concept … either with the aim of practical implementation … or of intellectual masturbation.

 

We made that choice many years ago … back in the mid-1990′s.

 

 

 

Practical Implementation of Sustainable Human & Social Development

 

In order to make any ‘real’ progress … how can we establish, agree upon and achieve a wide international consensus on what the ‘basic needs of all’ are … and with some precision ?

 

Is there an internationally recognized document, already long in existence, where these ‘basic needs’ are not only specified for all people, but are protected and guaranteed ?

 

Yes, indeed there is … the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN OHCHR) … and these needs, therefore, can also be described as being ‘responsible’.

 

 

Reading through the 1948 UDHR, it might be helpful if a distinction is made between human rights and social rights …

 

Social Rights:

Rights to which an individual person is legally entitled, e.g. the right to free elementary education (Art.26(1), UDHR), but which are only exercised in a social context with other people, and with the active support of a competent legal authority, e.g. a Nation State.

 

Commentary: In contrast to Human Rights, it is not protection from the State which is desired or achieved, but freedom with the State’s help.

 

Social Rights, as distinguished here, include and extend beyond current understandings of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.

 

 

 

This is why, almost a generation after the 1987 WCED/Brundtland Definition of  Sustainable Development …

 

… Sustainable Design International, has defined Sustainable Human & Social Development as follows …

 

Development which meets the responsible needs, i.e. the Human & Social Rights*, of this generation – without stealing the life and living resources from future generations, especially our children … and their children.

 

* As defined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN OHCHR).

 

 

Furthermore … for a sizeable group of people in all of our societies, the sole route of access to the human and social rights set down in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights … is the 2006 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities … which became an International Legal Instrument on 3rd May 2008 … just short of 60 Years after the UDHR was adopted on 10th December 1948 !

 

 

A 3rd International Instrument to be placed at the top of this Framework of Basic & Responsible Needs, i.e. Rights … is the 2001 Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO) … adopted in Paris, on 2nd November 2001 … and which came into being shortly after the World Trade Center (9-11) Incident in New York, on 11th September 2001.

 

The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity raises cultural diversity to the level of the common heritage of humanity … as necessary for humankind as biodiversity is for nature … and makes its defence an ethical imperative which is robustly linked to, and cannot be separated from, respect for the dignity of each individual person.

 

Paris, at the end of 2001, presented the world with a valuable opportunity …

-         to reaffirm the unshakable conviction that intercultural dialogue is the best guarantee of peace ;   and

-         to reject outright the theory of the inevitable clash of cultures and civilizations.

 

 

So … once it is possible to construct an initial, robust framework of International Human & Social Rights Instruments … specifying the ‘basic needs of all’ … which underpins and cuts down to the core of a far more elaborate and hard-edged, 2nd Generation Definition of Sustainable Human & Social Development …

 

 

 

… we can roll out the ‘Sustainability’ Agenda … and begin the serious task of transforming our Human Environment (see a previous post) by gradually improving and monitoring ‘real’ Sustainability Performance … using …

 

-         Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) … see a previous post ;

 

and

 

-         Performance Indicators ;

-         Target Setting ;

-         Benchmarking ;

-         Performance Evaluation & Independent Verification ;

-         Etc.

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: 'Sustainable Economic Development, 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN OHCHR), 1972 Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 2001 Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO), 2006 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2nd Generation Definition, basic needs of all, Benchmarking & Target Setting, cultural diversity is the common heritage of humanity, environmental aspects of sustainable development, extending to all the opportunity to satisfy their aspirations for a better life, Green Building Council (USA), Gro Harlem Brundtland (Norway), human environment, Human Rights, India, Ireland, Ireland's National Development Plan (2007-2013), LEED Environmental Building Rating System (USA), Mansour Khalid (Sudan), National Gallery of Art, Performance Evaluation & Independent Verification, social rights, Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA), Sustainability Implementation, Sustainability Performance, Sustainable Fire Engineering, Sustainable Human & Social Development, United States of America